# We’ve been making this case for years.

Our writing on consent, credit, and compensation, from the Disney-OpenAI deal to the NO FAKES Act, and what the shift to AI means for the people whose name, face, and voice are on the line.

## Featured Articles

### [The Disney-OpenAI Deal: Why Consent, Credit, and Compensation Became the Industry Standard](/content/blog-posts/the-disney-openai-deal-why-consent-credit-and-compensation-just-became-the-industry-standard/index.html)
Large AI partnerships are moving toward the same principles Official AI has argued for from the beginning: permission, provenance, and shared value.

### [Name, Image, Likeness, and Now AI: Owning Your Identity in the Digital Age](/content/blog-posts/name-image-likeness-and-now-ai-what-gonzaga-basketball-taught-me-about-owning-your-identity-in-the-digital-age/index.html)
Athletes helped define NIL. Generative AI raises the next question: who controls your image when someone else can generate it?

### [Protecting Your Livelihood: The NO FAKES Act and the Right to Publicity](/content/blog-posts/protecting-your-livelihood-the-no-fakes-act-and-the-right-to-publicity-in-the-age-of-generative-ai-part-1/index.html)
The right to publicity is becoming central as AI makes digital replicas cheaper, faster, and harder to trace.

### [CAA and YouTube Took an Important First Step, But the Real Solution Requires More Than Takedowns](/content/blog-posts/caa-and-youtube-take-important-first-step-but-real-solution-requires-more-than-takedowns/index.html)
Platform-native likeness detection helps, but people still need cross-platform authority, evidence, and durable records they control.

**More from the archive.** Years of writing on consent, credit, and compensation. Full articles are being migrated piece by piece; the rest are reserved while we migrate the original publication.